Biological evolution: a direct contradiction

June 28, 2014 | James Kohl

Biological evolution: Some genetic considerations

It will probably not be long until at least one prominent evolutionary theorist acknowledges this fact, “The concept of biological evolution… stands in direct contradiction with our current knowledge regarding the behavior as well as the structural and functional characteristics of the human genome and human proteome.”

When that fact is acknowledged, all of evolutionary theory will be exposed for what it has been since the invention of neo-Darwinism, which placed mutations and natural selection before ‘conditions of life’ that are obviously nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled.

Others may then ask evolutionary theorists why they thought mutations were the source of biodiversity, which is obviously nutrient-dependent and what they thought controlled the physiology of reproduction in species from microbes to man. The metabolism of nutrients to species-specific pheromones controls the physiology of reproduction. Ask a theorist how they could not know that fact.

Comments

comments

James Vaughn Kohl

James Vaughn Kohl

James Vaughn Kohl was the first to accurately conceptualize human pheromones, and began presenting his findings to the scientific community in 1992. He continues to present to, and publish for, diverse scientific and lay audiences, while constantly monitoring the scientific presses for new information that is relevant to the development of his initial and ongoing conceptualization of human pheromones.